RTUkraine's ex-President answers Putin's asylum offer -- RT Russia & Former Soviet Union
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-26% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-47% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : His predecessor, Viktor Yanukovich, received asylum in Russia after February 2014.54% : That's where we should direct our efforts and the efforts of law enforcement agencies, which are instead dealing with Poroshenko more than the Russian threat," he continued.
45% : According to him, Putin's offer of asylum "confirms" that Kiev's decision to prosecute its own former president is a present to Moscow.
34% : Poroshenko, who led Ukraine from 2014 to 2019, is being investigated over his alleged involvement in the funding of separatist fighters in Donbass, in eastern Ukraine, through the illegal purchase of $54 million worth of coal.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.