Unanimous SCOTUS: Boston discriminated against Christians in flag-flying process

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

62% :For "speech" to be spoken by the government, the relevant act of communication must be government action.
53% : But when the government speaks for itself, the First Amendment does not demand airtime for all views.
47% : Breyer leads off with this irony in his ruling opinion, noting the difference between "government speaking for itself" and a government inviting an open forum on the basis of diversity:When the government encourages diverse expression -- say, by creating a forum for debate -- the First Amendment prevents it from discriminating against speakers based on their viewpoint.
46% : Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U. S. 288, 294 (1984); see also Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 U. S 557, 569 (1995).
42% : It's indisputably a big win for the First Amendment, but ... which part?

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.