US judges split on Texas' standing to sue over DACA immigration program

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

53% : Advertisement · Scroll to continueThe 5th Circuit in 2022 largely affirmed that ruling but sent the case back to Hanen to consider a U.S. Department of Homeland Security regulation adopted that year formalizing and expanding DACA.
52% : Advertisement · Scroll to continueDACA was created in 2012 under Democratic former President Barack Obama and nearly 600,000 people known as "Dreamers" have enrolled in the program, allowing them to continue living and working in the United States.
51% : A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments for over an hour in the administration's appeal of a Texas judge's ruling blocking a 2022 rule designed to continue the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
50% : Mazzara cited a survey of DACA recipients submitted by New Jersey, which intervened in the case to defend the program, in which nearly one-quarter of the 3,000 respondents said they would likely leave the United States if DACA ended.
46% : For the states: Joseph Mazzara of the Texas Attorney General's officeFor DHS: Brian Boynton of the U.S. Department of JusticeFor the intervenor DACA recipients: Nina Perales of the Mexican-American Legal Defense & Educational FundFor New Jersey: Jeremy Feigenbaum of the New Jersey Attorney General's officeRead more:US judge rules against Biden DACA regulation for 'Dreamer' immigrantsU.S. judge rules DACA program illegal, suspends new applicationsU.S. Supreme Court allows Biden's shift on immigration enforcementU.S. Supreme Court thwarts Trump plan to end 'Dreamers' immigrant programReporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New YorkOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tabDaniel WiessnerThomson ReutersDan Wiessner (@danwiessner) reports on labor and employment and immigration law, including litigation and policy making.
38% : Texas and eight other Republican-led states sued in 2018, claiming DACA was invalid under federal immigration law.
31% : Higginson also questioned the nationwide scope of Hanen's ruling, appearing to agree with the Biden administration's argument that if the judge's decision is upheld it should be limited to blocking DACA in Texas.
23% : The Biden administration had argued in that appeal that Texas lacked standing to sue because it had not shown direct financial harms caused by DACA, but the 5th Circuit disagreed.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.