U.S. Tightens Border Rails to Counter Migrant Smuggling Surge
- Bias Rating
26% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
26% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-6% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : Amid a sharp increase in the smuggling of migrants via freight trains, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has taken decisive action by closing two critical rail bridges that connect Texas with Mexico.54% : The closures at the Eagle Pass and El Paso railway crossings, announced on a seemingly tranquil Sunday, reflect a growing concern within CBP about the sophisticated methods employed by smuggling organizations.
49% : CBP's strategy, while focused on curbing illegal migration, also opens up conversations about the broader implications of border enforcement.
48% : The closures prompt a reassessment of border security tactics, pushing authorities to innovate in managing migration flows without unduly hampering trade.
44% : It reflects a recognition that migration and border security issues are shared challenges requiring cooperative and coordinated responses.
39% : This move, indicative of the mounting pressures on state governments, underscores the ripple effect of federal border enforcement strategies.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.