New York Post Article RatingVance confirms Trump interviewing candidates to replace Wray as head...
- Bias Rating
58% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
86% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-48% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-6% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
20% : Vance shot back that Chong is a "mouth breathing imbecile" before going on to reveal that he and Trump were meeting with potential candidates to lead the bureau.11% : Vice President-elect JD Vance let slip that Trump is interviewing candidates to take over the FBI before the current director's term is up during a heated X exchange over Biden judicial nominee confirmations.
11% : In July, Wray questioned whether Trump had truly been struck by a bullet at the Butler Pa. rally where a would-be assassin shot him in the ear.
9% : Wray was installed in the position by Trump in 2017, but has since invoked the president-elect's wrath over what he sees as political investigations against him, such as the infamous Mar-a-Lago raid.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.