Hospital Review Article RatingViolating EMTALA, state abortion bans: What's at stake for physicians, hospitals
- Bias Rating
82% Extremely Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
82% Extremely Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-33% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : The law has since become the center of legal disputes over abortion in Idaho and Texas.37% : The Idaho law was set to criminalize most abortions, except for limited scenarios, including those where abortion is necessary to prevent the death of a pregnant woman.
35% : The judge ruled HHS' guidance that EMTALA covers abortions is unlawful, and preliminarily halted its enforcement in Texas, leaving healthcare professionals to defer to Texas law over EMTALA for abortion in medical emergencies.
31% : HHS specified that "stabilizing treatment could include medical and/or surgical interventions, including abortion," and that EMTALA preempts state law where abortion is prohibited and does not make exceptions for the health or life of a pregnant person.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.