VP Debate: Fact-Checking Claims Made by Vance and Walz

  • Bias Rating

    -50% Medium Liberal

  • Reliability

    65% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    -50% Medium Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    -3% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

7% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

83% : Walz: Minnesota is No. 1 for health care affordability, accessibility and quality.
54% : Additionally, U.S. News & World Report placed Minnesota at No. 6 for health care affordability in its rankings, showing that the state's position can vary depending on the methodology used.
53% : But the overwhelming scientific consensus is that carbon emissions are the leading cause of global warming.
53% : Fossil fuels -- coal, oil and gas -- are responsible for over 75 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, with carbon dioxide being the primary contributor to climate change, according to the United Nations.
46% : Vance's statement downplays established science on the role of carbon emissions in climate change.2.
39% : "Fact check: This statement implies some doubt about the role of carbon emissions in climate change.
20% : Claim: Vance suggested that carbon emissions may not be the primary driver of climate change, saying, "This idea that carbon emissions drives all the climate change.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link