Common Dreams Article RatingWalz Applauded for 'Calling Out Trump's Allegiance to Big Oil' in Debate With Vance | Common Dreams
- Bias Rating
6% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-11% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
3% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : ""Disasters like Helene are driven and turbo-charged by fossil fuels," said Oil Change U.S. campaign manager Collin Rees.41% : It is clear that he cannot be trusted to stand up to Trump, uphold his oath of office, and defend our freedom to vote."
22% : Vance also declined to say whether Trump lost the 2020 election, declaring that he is "focused on the future.
22% : "His refusal to acknowledge that Trump lost the 2020 election should be disqualifying.
15% : "Senator, what responsibility would the Trump administration have to try and reduce the impact of climate change?"In response, Vance called Hurricane Helene an "unspeakable human tragedy" but went on to suggest he doubts "this idea that carbon emissions drives
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.