Walz speaks of Trump 'madness' after report of comment about Hitler

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

38% : And responding to Kelly's comments to The Times, campaign communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement that the retired Marine general had "totally beclowned himself with these debunked stories he has fabricated because he failed to serve his President well while working as Chief of Staff."But even as the furor grew over the Atlantic report, Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, played into Democratic warnings that they'd take the country down a dark road.
34% : A tense atmosphere around a neck-and-neck election ratcheted up significantly following the article by Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg that said Trump had noted in a private conversation while president: "I need the kind of generals that Hitler had."
28% : "Vice President Kamala Harris' running mate seized on the report in the Atlantic as top party figures warned of dark days ahead if Trump wins the presidency in 13 days given his often-expressed autocratic instincts.
22% : After musing about turning the military or the National Guard on "enemies from within" in recent interviews (even specifying he was referring to top Democrats) and warning that TV networks like CBS should lose their licenses to broadcast, Trump launched a searing attack on Harris during a rally in North Carolina.
21% : Trump also said he'd ask Congress to pass a law that says anyone who burns the American flag should spend a year in prison.
17% : Trump is descending into this madness.
11% : In a separate interview with The New York Times, Kelly said Trump fit the definition of a fascist.
11% : Harris pressed home her closing argument that Trump represents a fundamental danger to America's character in an interview with NBC, while vowing to combat the high grocery and housing prices on which her rival has seized to lay out his own nightmare vision of a nation in crisis.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.