Walz touts EV jobs as he spars with Vance on clean energy in VP debate
- Bias Rating
12% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
28% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
14% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
22% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
69% : Data from the EIA also show that U.S. natural gas production has continued to reach all-time highs under Biden, as was the case under Trump, too.---------55% : Vance offered few specifics during the short debate exchange on how he and Trump would support U.S. manufacturing or clean energy jobs, though Trump has promised to achieve gains by eliminating so-called "EV mandates" that impact the auto industry and raising tariffs across the board on all U.S. imports - with even higher rates for goods from China.
53% : Vance also suggested that "Kamala Harris's policies actually led to more energy production in China, more manufacturing overseas, more doing business in some of the dirtiest parts of the entire world - and when I say that I mean the amount of carbon emissions they're doing per unit of economic output.
36% : Economists largely agree that such policies could wreak havoc on international trade and cause price increases for U.S. consumers, but Trump has stuck to the idea.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.