"Weird science": JD Vance questions climate change while dodging Trump's "hoax" comments
- Bias Rating
-50% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-28% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-36% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
5% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : We support the environment to be cleaner and safer, but one of the things that I have noticed some of our Democratic friends talking a lot about is a concern about carbon emissions," Vance said, noting that he wants to "re-shore as much American manufacturing as possible and you want to produce as much energy as possible in the United States" in response to climate concerns.20% : (Melina Mara/The Washington Post via Getty Images)Vice presidential hopeful JD Vance suggested during the debate Tuesday that decades of research backing up the relationship between climate change and fossil fuel emissions was "weird science.""This idea that carbon emissions drives all of the climate change, let's just say that that's true.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.