'What do you think?' Trump asked Putin if he should arm Ukraine: former officials
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-44% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-13% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
24% : "The reporting notes that Trump went into the meeting with "hawkish" notes prepared by his staff that went by the wayside as Putin made his case to the novice Trump.20% : ALSO READ: Trump's hate-filled rhetoric and its violent consequencesAt one pivotal moment, Trump asked Putin for advice ("What do you think?") on whether he should help arm Ukraine only to have the Russian leader tell him it would be " a mistake" before adding that Ukraine would come asking again if he complied.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.