What is the Cumbrian coalmine and why does it matter?
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-88% Very Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Detractors point out that building onshore windfarms - until recently subject to a ban in England - would produce many times more jobs and an ongoing source of clean energy.53% : Environmentally, it is adding to world supply and thus consumption of coal and releasing greenhouse gases, when there is an urgent need to reduce them.
48% : However, at least two UK steel-makers have ruled out using coal from the Cumbrian mine, and steel-makers across Europe are increasingly turning to low-carbon steel-making techniques, such as electric arc furnaces with energy from windfarms and other renewable sources.
48% : He told the Observer: "Over the past three years the UK has sought to persuade other nations to consign coal to history because we are fighting to limit global warming to 1.5C, and coal is the most polluting energy source.
47% :China is the world's biggest consumer of coal and is still building new coal-fired power plants.
41% : Some have argued that using Cumbrian coal would produce less carbon than importing coal for steel-making from other regions, such as Russia.
40% : The coal is also expected to be high in sulphur and therefore liable to be rejected even by steel-makers still using coal.
31% : Some argue it's a low-carbon alternative to importing coal, but others say Woodhouse Colliery would damage UK's climate reputationA new coalmine, the Woodhouse Colliery, has been proposed at a site near Whitehaven in Cumbria, with £165m investment and a production capacity of about 2.8m tonnes of coal a year.
31% : A new coalmine in Cumbria would produce far less carbon than China's planned expansion, but it would fuel criticism of the UK as a "hypocritical" developed country for advocating the phaseout of coal around the world while planning its expansion at home.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.