What the liberal justices' scorching dissent reveals about the US supreme court

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

48% : "In my view, when courts interpret the second amendment, it is constitutionally proper, indeed often necessary, for them to consider the serious dangers and consequences of gun violence that lead states to regulate firearms," Breyer writes.
47% : That theme reverberates throughout the liberals' dissent in Dobbs, which they conclude by warning that the court's decision to overturn the key precedent of Roe "breaches a core rule-of-law principle" and "places in jeopardy other rights, from contraception to same-sex intimacy and marriage".
27% : In her dissenting opinion in West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency, Kagan warns conservatives' decision to severely limit the federal government's ability to curtail greenhouse gas emissions threatens the separation of powers.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.