Why Special Counsel Jack Smith Filed a New Trump Indictment
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
44% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-60% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
9% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : In his majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts said that Trump enjoyed absolute immunity from any prosecution stemming from his consultation with Justice Department officials after the 2020 election.44% : The only difference is that a 45-page indictment has now been reduced to a 36-page indictment and several of the factual allegations in the original indictment have now been removed to try to comply with the Supreme Court's recent decision in Trump v. U.S.There the Supreme Court limited the kinds of evidence that can be introduced in any criminal case against a former president for acts he committed while in office.
43% : And the court also said that Trump enjoyed presumptive immunity from any prosecution related to his conversations with Vice President Mike Pence about whether Pence should certify the results of the election.
28% : "As a result, Smith removed from the indictment factual allegations related to the former, but left intact factual allegations related to the latter and took pains to emphasize that, in his view, Trump acted in his political and personal, rather than official, capacity.Smith's amended indictment is simply an attempt to get in front of likely legal arguments by Trump's legal team asking Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss all, or certain, of the Washington charges against him on this basis.
22% : In his Washington, D.C., case against Trump, which was related to Trump's conduct in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, Smith on Tuesday sought and received a superseding (amended) indictment.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.