Why the Trump hush money trial verdict is peak 'lawfare'

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

47% : Never before have state prosecutors charged a defendant with federal election reporting violations (state courts don't have jurisdiction) and never have non-disclosure agreements been found by a jury in any criminal trial to be a reportable federal campaign expenditure.
31% : In a game of legal hide the ball, Trump was denied the time-honored constitutional right to notice of the charges against him and to a unanimous jury verdict on those charges.
27% : When special counsel Robert Mueller exculpated Trump on the Russian collusion but found four possible instances of obstruction of justice, the left, without apology, just moved on.
4% : President Obama's Department of Justice commenced controversial counterintelligence investigations of Trump campaign officials and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign paid for a bogus "Steele Dossier" claiming Trump to be a Russian mole.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.