New York Post Article RatingWord games can't conceal the 'third world' truth about open borders
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-61% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-25% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
24% : "Trump called the alleged assailant "an animal" -- not, it should be noted, all migrants.20% : Trump was tagged a racist for calling migrants who rape and murder "animals" during last Saturday's campaign stop in Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin.
20% : As early as 2015, Trump insisted that uncontrolled illegal immigration would produce third-world conditions here at home.
19% : When he used the same word in April to describe the Venezuelan illegal immigrant who raped, bludgeoned and killed Georgia nursing student Laken Riley, Reuters accused Trump of wrongdoing for "resorting to the degrading rhetoric he has employed time and again.
16% : Trump was accused last week by The Washington Post of alarming voters by depicting an "imaginary and frightening world.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.