A serial perjurer will try to prove an old misdemeanor against Trump...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

60% : They could well succeed in a city where nine out of ten potential jurors despise Trump.
51% : He has a knack for selling his curious skill set to powerful figures like Trump and now Bragg.
45% : For those of us who have been critics of Cohen from when he was still working for Trump, it is mystifying that anyone would call him to the stand to attest to anything short of the time of day . . .
29% : Just a few weeks ago, another judge imposed a roughly half trillion dollar penalty in a case without a single victim who lost a single cent on loans with Trump.
28% : Pomerantz shocked many of us by publishing a book on the case against Trump -- who was still under investigation and not charged, let alone convicted, of any crime.
27% : Lawyers have been scouring the civil and criminal codes for any basis to sue or prosecute Trump before the upcoming 2024 election.
23% : Trump paid Daniels to avoid any publicity over their brief alleged affair.
23% : He is arguing that Trump intentionally lied when his former lawyer Michael Cohen listed the payments as retainer costs rather than a payment -- to avoid reporting it as a campaign contribution to himself.
23% : Trying Trump in Manhattan is about as difficult as the New York Yankees going to bat using beach balls rather than baseballs.
20% : The famous Roman philosopher and orator Marcus Tullius Cicero once said, "The more laws, the less justice."This week, New York judges and lawyers appear eager to prove that the same is true for cases against Donald Trump.
16% : With Trump, the Justice Department declined a repeat of the Edwards debacle and did not bring any federal charge.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.