Biden enriched Iran by more than $50 billion. Here's how to turn off the spigot
- Bias Rating
94% Very Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
94% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : Reversing course starts by locking down all funds made available for Iran this year - in Iraq, Oman, and Qatar.52% : That was a green light for Iran to activate its terror subsidiaries and commence the kind of barbaric slaughter we witnessed last week.
51% : By the time the administration authorized the much-discussed $6 billion from South Korea, a full-blown appeasement and enrichment effort towards Iran had been underway for months.
51% : But after all that has happened, if the White House still won't shut down its campaign of Iran appeasement, the Congress should show them how.
49% : Here's why:In May, White House Middle East Coordinator Brett McGurk secretly traveled traveled to Oman to pass a message along to Iran: America will pay the Ayatollah's price to keep Tehran from producing weapons-grade uranium.
44% : While Biden's words condemn Hamas' heinous crimes against humanity, he continues to enrich Hamas' parent company, Iran.
43% : Later that month, the Sultan of Oman traveled to Iran to broker the deal while the governor of the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) -- an institution subject to U.S. sanctions for its role in terror financing -- unexpectedly departed for Washington.
39% : In June, leaks to Israeli media revealed the extraordinary concessions Biden made to the Ayatollah: Iran would "stop the process of enriching uranium to high levels" in exchange for sanctions relief.
35% : It also includes enforcing oil sanctions already on the books, which the White House has refused to do.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPWith only days remaining before the U.N.'s missile embargo on Iran expires, too, the administration and our European allies should be pressed to immediately trigger the snapback of all U.N. sanctions on Iran.
34% : Others are noticing as well, which is why Biden is being pressured to re-freeze the $6 billion hostage ransom payment made to Iran last month.
33% : 3 THINGS US MUST DO TO AID ISRAEL AGAINST TERRORIST HAMASThe Biden administration then issued a sanctions waiver to provide Iran with at least $10 billion frozen in Iraq - and allow the money to be deposited in Iranian bank accounts in Oman.
30% : And while Biden is correctly giving Israel the time, space, and resources it needs to prepare for Hamas' destruction, he's simultaneously giving Iran the time, space, and resources it needs to rebuild that which Israel destroys.
28% : While the Biden administration was no doubt shocked too, it shouldn't have been surprised that its relentless appeasement of Iran is now exposed for the folly it is.
27% : Unnamed officials would soon admit the U.S. had already stopped enforcing oil sanctions on Iran - tacitly approving a million barrel per day increase in exports from Iran to China and generating tens of billions in annualized revenue.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.