Biden Regime Rejects JCPOA Restoration As Mandated by SC Res. 2231
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
58% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-34% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : The same applies to good faith outreach by Iran to revive the JCPOA since April 2021.56% : On Friday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Nasser Kanaani, said the following:"After receiving the (Biden regime's) response, the Islamic Republic of Iran's team of experts precisely reviewed it, and Iran's responses were drafted and submitted to the coordinator on Thursday night following evaluations at different levels," adding:"The submitted text has a constructive approach with the goal of finalizing the negotiations."
54% :Throughout months of talks over the past 17 months, Iran consistently demonstrated goodwill intentions to reach a fair and equitable agreement for all parties involved.
50% : And this from University of Tehran Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi -- involved in advising Iran's negotiating team, tweeting:"It's time for the Biden (regime) to make a serious decision.""For the US, 'constructive' usually means accepting US terms.""For Iran, it means a deal that is balanced and protected."
43% : According to Nour News with ties to Iran's Supreme National Security Council:"A deal lacking strong guarantees and failing to end politically motivated safeguards allegations will certainly not be a lasting and reliable one.""Therefore, there is no reason for Tehran to join it," adding:"(A)fter months of tough and complicated talks, Washington is still not ready to claim responsibility for its past mistakes by showing goodwill in accepting Iran's logical and legal demands," according to binding rule of law principles.
43% : Even if agreement is reached in some form ahead -- what all along appeared highly unlikely despite MSM regurgitated claims otherwise -- chances of it sticking are virtually nil, especially if aids Iran politically and economically.
35% : That's the dilemma Iran faced before the JCPOA was adopted in October 2015 and implemented in January 2016.
21% : Separately on Monday, a bipartisan group 34 Dems and 16 GOP congressional members "express(ed) deep concerns about a potential deal with Iran, urging the (Biden regime) not to act before consulting with Congress."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.