Biden's 3 options after troops killed as he's warned of disastrous consequences

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

81% : Meanwhile, Tyler Kustra, an assistant professor of politics and International Relations at the University of Nottingham said that Biden is "walking a very fine line.
56% : Dr Afzal Ashraf, who teaches International Relations and Politics at Loughborough University, and has spent over 30 years in the UK Armed Forces as a senior officer, told TheMirror.com what will happen next will "depend on a decision that Biden will have to make."
53% : Biden walked a good diplomatic line with his statement, but now Trump will win either way.
48% : He added: "I will suggest that that decision should be made after the facts become clearer."READ MORE: Donald Trump says 'we are on brink of World War 3' in angry Iran rant after drone strikeDr. Afzal Ashraf, teaches International Relations and Politics at Loughborough University, and has spent over 30 years in the UK Armed Forces as a senior officerFollowing Biden's declaration that he would "hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner of our choosing", Dr Ashraf said that this development "does present a very serious potential of escalation".
31% : Tyler Kustra's research focuses on economic sanctions and political violence"Americans are there as a trip-wire, if you kill enough of them then they will be forced to start a war.
24% : "President Trump is against this war.
18% : "Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Alie KhameneiConcluding that anything other than the indirect approach would be "disastrous" for Biden in his election year, considering Trump is against this war, Dr Ashraf said that the indirect approach would best be carried out by targeting Iranian personnel on foreign territory.
14% : President Trump chose to blow up some disused weapons dump rather than massively attack Syria after allegations it had used weapons of mass destruction.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.