Boston mayoral race: John Barros's interview with Boston.com
- Bias Rating
-34% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
46% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
2% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : So a guaranteed minimum income program for elders based on tax and tax increases, I think, would make a lot of sense.50% : On the community land trust, we were able to stabilize taxes.
46% : And so, in fact, an increase in taxes are not used as a displacement tool in our neighborhood, even though we continue to improve the neighborhood, so that you can in fact make an argument of improving a neighborhood, improving even real estate values of a neighborhood, and not displacing people who live there.
43% : And then in part of that housing equation is the increase of taxes, because our elders work hard to try to stabilize, to be able to stay in their homes, and then here come the taxes.
42% : Well, for every year we don't grow Mattapan, we're losing taxes on the rolls.
41% : We would probably be able to collect taxes earlier than we would if we just allowed the market to do it.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.