ABC NewsBoth claim to be 2nd Amendment stalwarts, but VP picks Walz and Vance differ on what that means
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
1% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-59% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : "We either go back with Trump and Vance or we go forward with Harris and Walz.51% : "I do think that the general consensus is that Trump would be much more favorable from a Second Amendment jurisprudence standpoint in his judicial appointments."
38% : "I do hear a lot from our members that they don't like Trump, but the sole reason they're voting for him is because of the Supreme Court and for federal judicial nominations.
37% : "She said that while she views Trump and Vance as a "gun extremist dream ticket," she said Harris and Walz have given her "hope.""The choice is simple.
37% : "Doar said his organization does not endorse presidential candidates and noted that his members don't necessarily like Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.