Can Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Save Affirmative Action?
- Bias Rating
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-65% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : One reason for the doom and gloom about the prospects for affirmative action is that Chief Justice John Roberts, who is the most moderate of the six Supreme Court justices, is on record as disliking race-conscious government policies.54% : Nonetheless, Brown Jackson is pursuing the routes most likely to give affirmative action a fighting chance of surviving.
47% : Her scathing, "in your face" style was credited by some with saving affirmative action in another case, ten years earlier.
41% : The plaintiffs suing Harvard University also claim that affirmative action violates federal civil rights law.
40% : Brown Jackson pressed the attorney for the plaintiff how, given the complexities of the college admissions process, they could show that any given student was rejected as a result of affirmative action.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.