Column: Reports of the death of Trump's Project 2025 are greatly exaggerated

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

65% : For one thing, Trump embraced the effort at its start.
46% : Trump has talked about them all.
45% : The Washington Post reported that some contributing authors, who once saw their involvement as a ticket to a job in Trump 2.0, were asking to have their names scratched from the final product.
36% : Harris mockingly asks rally crowds lately -- are in fact ideas that Trump himself calls for.
30% : The only way to put a stake through the thing is to make sure Trump isn't returned to the White House.
29% : "I know nothing about Project 2025," Trump wrote in a misnamed "truth" on his social media site last month.
25% : Let's say Trump, as president, does leave abortion issues to the states.
23% : Tear down the ethics wall that's blocked White House interference in Justice Department prosecutions and FBI investigations since Watergate so that Trump can deep-six the criminal cases against him and order up new ones against his enemies.
21% : So, sure, Trump can badmouth the Heritage project now that it's become a bogeyman.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.