Financial Times Article RatingCrypto lobbyists are polluting the US election
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-14% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-16% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
39% : And the idea that a group of bitcoin executives can provide Trump with 5mn voters is a farce that even he must be able to see through.30% : But Trump, alas, is no longer right about crypto.
28% : He vowed last month to stop Joe Biden's crusade to crush crypto and said that he would support the right to self-custody -- technical language that sounds very unlike something Trump would have come up with himself.
25% : You can see why Trump might have found their arguments so persuasive.
20% : "It sounded suspiciously like Trump had been having some deep and meaningfuls with the crypto industry.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.