Did Henry Kissinger Further U.S. National Interests or Harm Them?
- Bias Rating
-28% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-44% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Kissinger decided rightly that serving as the U.S. secretary of state was more important than teaching.54% : He was also an effective bureaucratic operator and even managed to get himself appointed as both national security advisor and secretary of state at the same time.
54% : He had some notable foreign-policy successes, but so did many other national security advisors and secretaries of state.
43% : Indeed, looking at the White House today and its inability to navigate the war in Ukraine or the current chaos in the Middle East, one might wish that we had some people in government who were as creative or as flexible in their thinking as Kissinger.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.