Disability campaigners to take abortion law case to Supreme Court
- Bias Rating
-60% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
68% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
26% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
42% : The campaign to change the legal time limit for abortion in cases of disability is being led by Heidi Crowter, a 27-year-old woman with Down's syndrome, and Máire Lea-Wilson, who was pressured to abort her son when a 34-week scan revealed he had the condition.42% : Abortion is legal in England, Wales and Scotland up to 24 weeks, but in cases of disability, including Down's syndrome, cleft lip and club foot, babies can be aborted up to birth.
40% : Crowter and Lea-Wilson were seeking to overturn a previous ruling that the time limit for abortion on the grounds of disability is not unlawful.
36% : A spokeswoman for CARE said, "It is completely wrong that disability is a ground for abortion up to birth.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.