Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inCreate your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log in
Yes because taking preventative action is effective and will help mitigate the impact on underdeveloped countries.
Yes, I think it is extremely important to help underdeveloped countries. Helping these countries will also positively impact the rest of the world.
Global health initiatives should absolutely prioritize eradicating preventable diseases in underdeveloped countries. If resources are available to help a large portion of the population with solvable …Read MoreGlobal health initiatives should absolutely prioritize eradicating preventable diseases in underdeveloped countries. If resources are available to help a large portion of the population with solvable health issues, then they should be utilized. Focusing on public health in underdeveloped countries will improve quality of life and standard of living. Read Less
It should definitely be a priority because by positively impacting part of the world in the health sector, you will positively be impacting the rest of the world in the health sector as well.
It should be a goal, but also with the added goal of improving existing healthcare infrastructure in those countries.
Not to be snarky, but isn’t eradicating preventable diseases one of the main motives for global health initiatives- as in, their whole reason for being?
Initatives such as these have been done before and have made positive impacts worldwide. Should be continued.
Yes, I believe this is crucial as it could prevent significant chaos and suffering.
Yes, the elimination of preventable diseases not only helps those who reside in those countries but people all over the world.
Yes, this makes sense given that these initiatives have the knowledge and ability to prevent these diseases and save lives.
Yes, this benefits communities on all levels (individual, national, international) and helps increase global relations.
Yes, this will help the global income inequality issue. It also will save many lives in the process.
Yes, this is important because it might be hard for underdeveloped countries to focus on this since the day to day sufferings are a lot. This will benefit the society as a whole.
Yes because people in those countries deserve a chance at prosperity and should not have to suffer through horrible illnesses just because they are underdeveloped. Further, eradicating diseases can …Read MoreYes because people in those countries deserve a chance at prosperity and should not have to suffer through horrible illnesses just because they are underdeveloped. Further, eradicating diseases can have a much larger – even global – benefit that is worth prioritizing. Read Less