The only reason I say no is because I do not trust that other nations would be honest in sharing technology. For example, China has it in their interest to sabotage American cyber capabilities and it …Read MoreThe only reason I say no is because I do not trust that other nations would be honest in sharing technology. For example, China has it in their interest to sabotage American cyber capabilities and it would be foolish to give the Chinese any knowledge of what we can do.Read Less
I do not think that there needs to be a pact for sharing intelligence on cyber threats. I think that the United States and allies should share intelligence on cyber threats to protect each other. …Read MoreI do not think that there needs to be a pact for sharing intelligence on cyber threats. I think that the United States and allies should share intelligence on cyber threats to protect each other. However, I do not think that this needs to be a pact for such things as allies should help protect each other. Protecting each other as allies keeps the relationships healthy and being able to rely on one another as needed.Read Less
Yes, forming a pact among nations to share intelligence on cyber threats can be highly beneficial, even when considering adversarial nations like China, Russia, or North Korea. Such collaboration can …Read MoreYes, forming a pact among nations to share intelligence on cyber threats can be highly beneficial, even when considering adversarial nations like China, Russia, or North Korea. Such collaboration can enhance overall security by pooling resources and insights to combat transnational cyber threats, leading to faster responses and the exchange of best practices. While trust issues and geopolitical tensions complicate cooperation with these nations, establishing clear incentives and robust accountability mechanisms can foster participation. Existing international pacts, such as the Five Eyes Alliance, NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defense Centre, and the G7 Cybersecurity Initiative, demonstrate a commitment to collective action against cyber threats. Larger multilateral intelligence-sharing pact could significantly strengthen global cybersecurity efforts, promoting resilience and stability in cyberspace while addressing the challenges posed by historically adversarial countries.Read Less
I answered maybe because while sharing intelligence can enhance collective security and improve threat response, it can also come with significant risks. One major concern is the potential for …Read MoreI answered maybe because while sharing intelligence can enhance collective security and improve threat response, it can also come with significant risks. One major concern is the potential for sensitive information to be leaked or missed by partner nations. Also, there is the risk of differing national priorities, and agendas, which could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine trust among the participating countries.Read Less
The only reason I say no is because I do not trust that other nations would be honest in sharing technology. For example, China has it in their interest to sabotage American cyber capabilities and it …Read MoreThe only reason I say no is because I do not trust that other nations would be honest in sharing technology. For example, China has it in their interest to sabotage American cyber capabilities and it would be foolish to give the Chinese any knowledge of what we can do. Read Less
I do not think that there needs to be a pact for sharing intelligence on cyber threats. I think that the United States and allies should share intelligence on cyber threats to protect each other. …Read MoreI do not think that there needs to be a pact for sharing intelligence on cyber threats. I think that the United States and allies should share intelligence on cyber threats to protect each other. However, I do not think that this needs to be a pact for such things as allies should help protect each other. Protecting each other as allies keeps the relationships healthy and being able to rely on one another as needed. Read Less
Yes, forming a pact among nations to share intelligence on cyber threats can be highly beneficial, even when considering adversarial nations like China, Russia, or North Korea. Such collaboration can …Read MoreYes, forming a pact among nations to share intelligence on cyber threats can be highly beneficial, even when considering adversarial nations like China, Russia, or North Korea. Such collaboration can enhance overall security by pooling resources and insights to combat transnational cyber threats, leading to faster responses and the exchange of best practices. While trust issues and geopolitical tensions complicate cooperation with these nations, establishing clear incentives and robust accountability mechanisms can foster participation. Existing international pacts, such as the Five Eyes Alliance, NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defense Centre, and the G7 Cybersecurity Initiative, demonstrate a commitment to collective action against cyber threats. Larger multilateral intelligence-sharing pact could significantly strengthen global cybersecurity efforts, promoting resilience and stability in cyberspace while addressing the challenges posed by historically adversarial countries. Read Less
I answered maybe because while sharing intelligence can enhance collective security and improve threat response, it can also come with significant risks. One major concern is the potential for …Read MoreI answered maybe because while sharing intelligence can enhance collective security and improve threat response, it can also come with significant risks. One major concern is the potential for sensitive information to be leaked or missed by partner nations. Also, there is the risk of differing national priorities, and agendas, which could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine trust among the participating countries. Read Less