Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inCreate your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log in
This is an increasingly used method of warfare so guidelines should be considered.
I think it is good to have protocols to control digital warfare and cyber defense as this is the up and coming area of attack. The amount of cyber attack and digital attacks such as ransomware threats …Read MoreI think it is good to have protocols to control digital warfare and cyber defense as this is the up and coming area of attack. The amount of cyber attack and digital attacks such as ransomware threats are all increasing, forcing all countries to be alert. Read Less
This method of warfare can be more dangerous for developing countries because access to the digital world can be limited. For that reason, international protocols are a good idea.
To paraphrase the retired General Mark Milley, the nature of war does not change but its character does. The nature of has stayed the same, politics, escalation, violence, terror, etc. The character …Read MoreTo paraphrase the retired General Mark Milley, the nature of war does not change but its character does. The nature of has stayed the same, politics, escalation, violence, terror, etc. The character has changed usually with advancing technology. The invention and advancement in firearms lead to the deaths of spears, swords and mounted cavalry. The creation of warplanes and their use by national navies lead to the battleship being discarded in favor of the aircraft carrier. The atom bomb made direct conflict between superpowers not an option, so they resorted to proxy wars and espionage. And now here we are with modern digital and cyber warfare. The potential this has for sabotage, both on military and civilian targets is huge, especially for countries like the United States that relies heavily on its technological advantages. Digital information could be stolen or leaked, communications could be disrupted, or civil unrest fermented by infiltrating social media. With the potential damage that such a thing could cause, some kind of internationally enforced protocol or etiquette may be necessary. There’s also precedent set for this kind of thing, as there are international laws against the use of certain chemical weapons and other such weapons. Read Less