No, I do not think that there needs to be a global response on the social impacts of automation. I think that each country can handle the issue of the social impacts of automation. A global response I …Read MoreNo, I do not think that there needs to be a global response on the social impacts of automation. I think that each country can handle the issue of the social impacts of automation. A global response I think is too much overreaching when each country can handle laws or regulations on the topic.Read Less
Global cooperation insofar as there should be a concerted effort amongst the industrialized world. However, I don’t think it is the duty of say the United Nations to intervene in individual nations. …Read MoreGlobal cooperation insofar as there should be a concerted effort amongst the industrialized world. However, I don’t think it is the duty of say the United Nations to intervene in individual nations. But there should be a multi-lateral approach to fixing the problem since the coming decades may see mass unemployment depending on how fast AI advances and how different industries react to technological advancements. That also ties into questions about how the welfare systems of the world will react to said advancements.Read Less
I believe a coordinated global response could lead to a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. Counties can share their practices, technology, and strategies to mitigate the …Read MoreI believe a coordinated global response could lead to a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. Counties can share their practices, technology, and strategies to mitigate the negative effects of automation on employment. This collaboration can also foster innovation and ensure that the benefits of automation are enjoyed by all. Of course, achieving global coordination can be challenging as different countries have varying levels of technological advancements, economic priorities, and regulatory frameworks, which can complicate global collaboration.Read Less
No, I do not think that there needs to be a global response on the social impacts of automation. I think that each country can handle the issue of the social impacts of automation. A global response I …Read MoreNo, I do not think that there needs to be a global response on the social impacts of automation. I think that each country can handle the issue of the social impacts of automation. A global response I think is too much overreaching when each country can handle laws or regulations on the topic. Read Less
Global cooperation insofar as there should be a concerted effort amongst the industrialized world. However, I don’t think it is the duty of say the United Nations to intervene in individual nations. …Read MoreGlobal cooperation insofar as there should be a concerted effort amongst the industrialized world. However, I don’t think it is the duty of say the United Nations to intervene in individual nations. But there should be a multi-lateral approach to fixing the problem since the coming decades may see mass unemployment depending on how fast AI advances and how different industries react to technological advancements. That also ties into questions about how the welfare systems of the world will react to said advancements. Read Less
I believe a coordinated global response could lead to a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. Counties can share their practices, technology, and strategies to mitigate the …Read MoreI believe a coordinated global response could lead to a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. Counties can share their practices, technology, and strategies to mitigate the negative effects of automation on employment. This collaboration can also foster innovation and ensure that the benefits of automation are enjoyed by all. Of course, achieving global coordination can be challenging as different countries have varying levels of technological advancements, economic priorities, and regulatory frameworks, which can complicate global collaboration. Read Less