Emergency medical protocols may effect groups of people differently. For example, the protocols for smaller countries like Moldova may not work in the United States. It could clog up roads, lead to …Read MoreEmergency medical protocols may effect groups of people differently. For example, the protocols for smaller countries like Moldova may not work in the United States. It could clog up roads, lead to inefficient government spending, and more. Furthermore, what constitutes an emergency may differ by culture. Overall, I think the United States ought to be in control of its own measures.Read Less
No, I do not think there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicine protocols. Countries have different names, formulations, and standards for prescribing medicine. It would …Read MoreNo, I do not think there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicine protocols. Countries have different names, formulations, and standards for prescribing medicine. It would take a lot of time to standardize this as countries’ governments do what they think is best for their citizens so this would hinder this. Also, countries like the USA and the UK are much different sizes so the protocols are much different on transportation. I think an international standardization would cause more pain than good.Read Less
Yes there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicial protocals. Standardized protocols would ensure that all medical professionals are trained to provide the same level of, …Read MoreYes there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicial protocals. Standardized protocols would ensure that all medical professionals are trained to provide the same level of care, regardless of where they are in the world. This could lead to better outcomes in international crises where medical teams from different countries need to work together seamlessly.Read Less
Emergency medical protocols may effect groups of people differently. For example, the protocols for smaller countries like Moldova may not work in the United States. It could clog up roads, lead to …Read MoreEmergency medical protocols may effect groups of people differently. For example, the protocols for smaller countries like Moldova may not work in the United States. It could clog up roads, lead to inefficient government spending, and more. Furthermore, what constitutes an emergency may differ by culture. Overall, I think the United States ought to be in control of its own measures. Read Less
No, I do not think there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicine protocols. Countries have different names, formulations, and standards for prescribing medicine. It would …Read MoreNo, I do not think there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicine protocols. Countries have different names, formulations, and standards for prescribing medicine. It would take a lot of time to standardize this as countries’ governments do what they think is best for their citizens so this would hinder this. Also, countries like the USA and the UK are much different sizes so the protocols are much different on transportation. I think an international standardization would cause more pain than good. Read Less
Yes there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicial protocals. Standardized protocols would ensure that all medical professionals are trained to provide the same level of, …Read MoreYes there should be an international effort to standardize emergency medicial protocals. Standardized protocols would ensure that all medical professionals are trained to provide the same level of care, regardless of where they are in the world. This could lead to better outcomes in international crises where medical teams from different countries need to work together seamlessly. Read Less