AlterNet Article Rating

Don't call it the 'hush money' case

Apr 12, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -66% Medium Liberal

  • Reliability

    45% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -43% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-4% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

73% : That's exactly how Trump wants it characterized.
67% : The way Trump's actions are characterized -- the words used to describe what Trump has done to America -- are critically important.
60% : The entire purpose of the payoff was to help Trump become president.
37% : The 34-count business falsification case may be the only case against Trump to reach a verdict before the November election.
37% : Together, they establish an ongoing pattern: Trump will do anything to gain and keep power, even if his actions violate the nation's laws.
31% : This case alleges that in 2016 Trump arranged to pay off an adult entertainer in order to hide his affair with her from the public.
29% : So it looks like the district attorney is tarring Trump with having had an extramarital affair with a porn star -- a form of character assassination, not a crime.
27% : "In calling this the "hush money" or "sex scandal" case and implying that Trump was merely trying to hide his tryst with a porn star, the mainstream media is minimizing its significance and misleading the public.
24% : It was criminal because Trump interfered in an election.
22% : Trump then sought to cover it up with false entries in business records.
21% : Trump then went to great lengths to hide this conduct, causing dozens of false entries in business records to conceal criminal activity.
20% : As Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg explained, Trump was out to:"bury negative information about him and boost his electoral prospects.
18% : Trump tried to keep relevant information from voters on the eve of the 2016 election.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link