Financial Times Article RatingDrones target Iranian military site in Isfahan
- Bias Rating
-50% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
42% : Iran acknowledged a drone strike had targeted one of its military sites in the central city of Isfahan at the weekend, but stopped short of accusing any foreign or opposition groups of engineering the attack.39% : The same governments, as well as Israel, have also expressed concern about Iran's development of its nuclear programme, vowing not to allow Tehran to build atomic weapons.
33% : Israel is widely believed to have masterminded a series of operations inside Iran over the past decade to sabotage the country's nuclear programme.
30% :Western governments have criticised Iran for supplying Russia with drones that are being used in the war against Ukraine.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.