Editorial: Supreme Court should not yank away the lifeline for people drowning in student debt
- Bias Rating
-98% Very Liberal
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-11% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : Student loans have mired millions of Americans in debt.51% : For example, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. asked why it was fair to make the owner of a lawn care service, who took out a loan to start his business, pay taxes that subsidize debt forgiveness for a better-paid college graduate.
47% : And while addressing the problem of student debt in the future will involve measures other than loan forgiveness -- including reducing the costs of higher education and putting more emphasis on non-college opportunities -- debt relief is an indispensable part of the solution.
46% : That relief is far less generous than proposals for a blanket forgiveness of student debt up to $50,000 per borrower.
42% : The government argues persuasively that the challengers -- six states and two student loan borrowers who are excluded from some or all of the program's benefits -- haven't sustained the sort of injury that gives them standing to sue.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.