Federal judge rules in favor of pro-life resource centers in Vermont civil rights case

  • Bias Rating

    -12% Somewhat Liberal

  • Reliability

    60% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    -20% Somewhat Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    16% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : The U.S. Supreme Court sided in 2018 with the Institute in the case NIFLA v. Becerra, ruling that centers should be free to serve women without government intervention for their viewpoint or message.
52% : "Following the trial in May, Theriot suggested that elements of Act 15 may have been influenced by the state's Planned Parenthood lobbyTheriot said that he expects the court to rule without going to trial.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link