Following Harris and Walz through the battleground states

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

66% : the way he talks about policy, how he would suddenly become a great asset for Trump.DAVIES:
64% : And the question is a little bit, well, if Vance is the pugnacious figure and Trump is the pugnacious figure, then who is it ultimately who is reaching out to those on-the-fence voters and saying, I see you; you know, I'm an approachable, appealing, personable figure?
59% : The privilege of my lifetime was spending two decades teaching in public schools...WALZ: ...And, you might have heard, coaching football to a state championship.
51% : Now, there - young people are choosing Harris over Trump by as many as 20 points.
49% : But it sort of reminds you that you have absolutely no choice but to go out there, stand in line, talk to people and hear about what it is that they're feeling and doing and sacrificing and seeking if you're going to try to understand what politics is really about.DAVIES: You know, when you laid out that question a moment ago about - what is this moment in America?
40% : But it hasn't really played out for Vance, of course, in the election in the way that he or Trump would want.
31% : I mean, he was - to borrow a phrase that Tim Walz has used about Trump, in some ways, he's frozen in the face of this very different ticket.
29% : People know what it means when a candidate starts to raise crazy claims about the use of artificial intelligence as Trump has done to try to undermine the possibility that she's getting huge crowds.
23% : It's not clear what Vance has delivered for Trump, and it's hard to see how - short of some really big shift in his language or
11% : Trump, who is also well-funded and determined, is now attacking Harris in countless ads and public comments, even as he laments Biden's exit from the campaign.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.