Fossil fuels are not the enemy, bad policy is
- Bias Rating
88% Very Conservative
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
27% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
74% : Fossil fuels have hovered around 80% of total energy usage for some time; global oil consumption continues to rise.63% : Very strong and positive correlations exist between the use of fossil fuels and rise in GDP, income, wealth, life expectancy and overall quality of life, simply because this resource has enabled countless technological advancements.
63% : The report emphasizes "reliability to be a top priority for energy policymakers, regulators and industry.
52% : The global elites once again patted themselves on the back for saving the planet, marking the latest COP28 with an actual commitment to "transition away" from fossil fuels.
52% : AT UN CLIMATE CONFERENCEStates with stringent Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) - which require a certain percentage of electricity to be renewable - have often seen the biggest utility rate hikes, up to 50% higher than states without an RPS due to high costs of implementation.
49% : The current administration has done all in its power to curb fossil fuel production and usage: canceled pipelines, drilling moratoriums, delayed permitting, stringent EPA rules, additional fees on oil and gas, plans to shut down coal plants.
48% : Perhaps had fossil fuels not been restricted in the first place, such crises would have been averted.
44% : Over time, it created a net-zero movement, which in part seeks to replace fossil fuels with so-called green energy sources through heavy government subsidization.
42% : Coal saved the day for this storm and others, including Uri, where the Texas power grid was minutes away from collapse.
42% : The real crime is forbidding fledgling countries the same life-saving technologies and basic luxuries we enjoy by banning them from using fossil fuels.
41% : Net-zero policies are the root cause of today's energy crisis because they have restricted fossil fuel investment, production and transport.
38% : More detrimental than anything fossil fuels can do to the environment are the policies so many of our world leaders have enacted to limit their usage.
35% : Demonizing fossil fuels does more harm than good.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.