Here's the Surprising Backstory of the Downfall of Roe v Wade
- Bias Rating
76% Very Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
90% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-10% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Along the way, the viability standard had come to be seen as beneficial for pro-life legislatures' attempts to restrict abortion to earlier in pregnancy.50% : In Roe, the high court established that abortion was legal until the unborn child "has the capability of meaningful life outside the mother's womb," wrote Justice Blackmun in the majority opinion.
49% : "That was the strong consensus, but it was very clear that Planned Parenthood wasn't challenging 20-week laws, because that was too close to the viability line."
46% : "I think it was really meaningful for me because I had a 6-month-old that I actually took to Mississippi to that meeting," Hawley said of her efforts to end the constitutional right to abortion.
46% : "I think it was a good strategy of bringing the Mississippi law limiting abortion to 15 weeks, to make them realize how radical [our abortion] law is-15 weeks puts us in line with [abortion restrictions] in Europe, and no one thinks Europe is like the religious right."
44% : Pro-life politicians in Mississippi had already been working on legal challenges to abortion.
43% : The overturning of Roe v. Wade can be traced back to the day the court ruled in 1973 that there was a constitutional right to abortion.
43% : Arkansas and Utah expressed interest in passing laws to challenge the viability standard, and both states eventually passed laws restricting abortion before 18 weeks in 2019.
42% : Through the decades, pro-life forces embraced various strategies to challenge that ruling with limited success.
42% : A state legislature would have to essentially pass a law restricting abortion before viability, wait for that law to be challenged under the viability standard established in Roe and Casey and then hope it would be appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court.
42% : We just have to decide thumbs up/thumbs down on Roe and on the constitutional rights on abortion.'"Waggoner, who's set to present oral arguments before the court for the third time this fall, was also taken aback.
27% : In 1992, another Supreme Court decision on abortion, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, allowed states to place some restrictions on abortion while still embracing the concept that women have a right to get an abortion before viability.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.