Hong Kong top court affirms government obligation to recognise same-sex couples
- Bias Rating
90% Very Conservative
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
90% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : However, the five-judge panel unanimously upheld lower court rulings which held that the constitutional freedom of marriage guaranteed and protected under Hong Kong's Bill of Rights and the Basic Law (the "mini constitution") is confined to opposite-sex marriage.48% : Following previous challenges surrounding same-sex couples' access to dependent visas, spousal benefits for civil servants and access to public housing, the court observed that litigation and court proceedings have subjected same-sex couples to publicity, stress and expenses, while they still suffer from difficulties due to the non-recognition of their relationships.
47% : By a majority of 3 to 2, the court acknowledged same-sex couples' need for an alternative legal framework in order to meet basic social requirements as well as to have a sense of legitimacy.
46% : The courts were also unwilling to recognise foreign same-sex marriages under Hong Kong law, and they denied that authorities have a constitutional obligation to enable official recognition of same-sex partnerships.
45% : The court also held that the government's longstanding failure to do so amounts to a violation of the constitutional right to privacy, but it denied that the right to same-sex marriage is constitutionally guaranteed.
45% : In fact, Sham was not the first to challenge the failure of the laws in Hong Kong to recognise and accept same-sex marriage.
39% : The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal handed down a judgment on Tuesday finding that the Hong Kong government has a duty to provide an "alternative legal framework for recognition of same-sex relationships."
39% : Sham's initial attempt and his first appeal failed, as lower courts were unwilling to recognise a constitutional right for same-sex couples to enter into a marriage in Hong Kong.
38% : He and his husband got married in New York 10 years ago and have been challenging Hong Kong's refusal to recognize same-sex marriage since 2018.
31% : Further, as same-sex couples lack the capacity to enter into a legally recognised marriage in Hong Kong, any recognition of foreign same-sex marriages is also denied according to the lex specialis principle.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.