How Democrats' chaos upend Trump's veepstakes: Put Glenn Youngkin in...
- Bias Rating
Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-2% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : Yes, Trump's leading in the wake of President Biden's implosion, but his victory is hardly assured -- and he could wind up facing a ticket of Kamala Harris (or Cali's Gov. Gavin Newsom) and some mystery No. 2, likely painted as a moderate.Playing for a bigger win requires choosing a No. 2 who'll reassure voters that Trump's second term will be one of stability, not chaos.37% : Trump's plainly taking it seriously -- after all, his hopes and the country's fate are at stake.
26% : So, while North Dakota's Burgum would be fine (while Vance looks risky in any circumstances), it's not too late to consider someone like Virginia's Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who could clinch the case for Trump in a state that's newly in-play -- not to mention among swing voters across the nation.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.