How Secretary of State Races Became Key Focus in Election Integrity Battle
- Bias Rating
76% Very Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-18% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-2% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : Of four Democrat-held state secretary of state seats, Ms. Marshall is the only incumbent seeking reelection in a state President Trump won in 2020.39% : "Sen. Rowden is using the same playbook that Joe Biden is using on President Trump to silence me and win and beat me in a statewide race by using his position of power to be punitive," Mr. Hoskins told reporters.
31% : Ms. Griffin-Valade is not seeking election, but her time in office has been substantive in opposing efforts to remove President Trump from the primary ballot and enforcing a 2022 constitutional amendment that disqualifies state lawmakers with 10 or more unexcused absences from legislative sessions from serving another term.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.