'Insultingly stupid': Legal experts spurn Trump's bid to ditch classified documents case

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : On the motion to dismiss for unconstitutional "vagueness," the security expert Moss said, "I also won't waste my time with this one.
37% : "Secrets and Laws, an account that purports to be run by a former CIA lawyer, chimed in:"If Trump really designated all the classified docs he took as 'personal records,' why did he return 184 of them to NARA & another 38 to DOJ in response to the subpoena?
36% : ""Trump is arguing he designated all these highly classified records as PERSONAL records, and that he therefore had the right to keep them," Moss said.
19% : Trump did the standard 'the espionage act provision is unconstitutionally vague' argument every EspAct defendant tries.
17% : Donald Trump on Thursday filed several motions seeking to throw out the criminal case he faces for allegedly keeping classified documents from the White House from authorities, but legal experts were quick to shut down the court filing.
14% : ALSO READ: How Donald Trump is spreading a dangerous mental illness to his supportersLegal experts were quick to rail against the filings online.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.