American Thinker Article Rating

Joe Biden's Iran Appeasement

Oct 13, 2023 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    96% Very Conservative

  • Reliability

    95% ReliableExcellent

  • Policy Leaning

    94% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -35% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

66% : "With sanctions ignored, sale of oil from Iran has boomed over the last year.
59% : Biden restored sanctions waivers to Iran that allow international nuclear cooperation and sale of oil.
57% : He enshrined the appeasement in international law at the U.N. Security Council, presenting Congress with a fait accompli.
56% : Blinken said that restoring the waivers will help the talks in Vienna by having countries return to the agreement reached between Iran and a group of countries including China, France, Germany, Russia, Britain, and the United States.
48% : And a Hamas spokesman told the BBC that it received support from Iran to conduct its attack.
45% : An agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), to further Iran's nuclear development was reached under former president Barack Obama.
41% : The waivers permit Russian, Chinese, and European companies to carry out non-proliferation work to make it more difficult for Iranian nuclear sites to be used for weapons development.
40% : But the tweet rings hollow when we consider that Obama appeased Iran in 2015 and implemented the Iran nuclear agreement, the JCPOA, by circumventing the U.S. Constitution by not submitting the agreement as a treaty, which would have required Senate ratification.
38% : Is Biden's reason because he wishes to appease Iran?And let's not overlook that other Iran appeaser, Barack H. Obama.
32% : The bumbling chief appeaser who currently occupies the Bully Pulpit denounced on 10 October Hamas's attack on Israel, but in his entire 10-minute speech, he failed, as appeasement, to mention Iran even once.
32% : This sale is currently going on with the full knowledge of the Biden administration, who prioritize appeasing Iran over enforcing sanctions.
25% : "Biden calls for a ceasefire in a war that's not going well for a surrogate of Iran, but not one for the Ukraine war.
23% : Blinken said Sunday on CNN's State of the Union, "We have not yet seen evidence that Iran directed or was behind this particular attack, but there is certainly a long relationship."
14% : The Biden Bunch is now trying to deny one of his appeasement maneuvers by having secretary of state Tony Blinken claim that there is no evidence that Iran had anything to do with Hamas's attack.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link