The Philadelphia Inquirer Article RatingJudge Daniel D. McCaffery belongs on the Pa. Supreme Court | Endorsement
- Bias Rating
-66% Very Liberal
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-52% Very Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-65% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : But Carluccio told this board she would follow Act.57% : During a Republican forum in Erie last spring, Carluccio said she would welcome a chance to review Act 77, a law passed in 2019 with overwhelming GOP support that expanded mail-in voting.
51% : She was endorsed by two Pennsylvania antiabortion associations and removed a reference on her website that said she was a defender of "all life under the law.
50% : "In a meeting with this board, Carluccio said she would follow the law in Pennsylvania regarding abortion.
48% : Voters deserve judges who follow the law and not the political winds.
39% : She declared the law "bad for the commonwealth" and referenced unproven "hanky-panky" with mail ballots.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.