Kamala Harris: The 'discount-Obama' repeating Clinton's 2016 playbook
- Bias Rating
88% Very Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
36% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-20% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-9% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : Two election cycles after Trump's first upset against a heavily hyped Democrat, the former president could easily triumph again.58% : Transgender issues now dominate school sports and medical care, while the chasm between left and right is so vast, it almost cost Trump his life.
53% : Imagine mega-Zooms of Whites-for-Trump or pro-lifers-for Trump or Trads-for-Trump.
44% : "Fed up with the preachy do-goodism and blanket-blaming [by] the elite," I wrote, Trump is "offering a safe space to supporters shut out from increasingly rigid definitions of 'acceptable' cultural conversations.
41% : As I explained, a mix of racial anxiety, political alienation and over-reaching identity politics was propelling rural whites and working-class urbanites toward Trump in an act of unanticipated voter retribution.
32% : There was too much girl power and not enough hard power to defeat a brute like Trump.
12% : The conditions that allowed Trump to beat Clinton have been weaponized far beyond their 2016 levels, making Harris -- even with her more than $300 million war chest -- an uncertain winner.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.