The Guardian Article RatingKey architect of Theresa May's 2017 election failure selected for safe seat
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-19% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Timothy, 43, a supporter of Brexit who was a special adviser to May in the Home Office during the era of the hostile environment policy that led to the Windrush scandal, was confirmed as West Suffolk's Tory parliamentary candidate on Sunday night.47% : As co-author of May's election manifesto and its "dementia tax" policy - which put no cap on social care costs but allowed people to keep £100,000 of assets - he was widely blamed by the Tories for the election results.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.