The Guardian Article Rating

Lazy and fraudulent: we saw the true Johnson at the Covid inquiry - and why his like must never have power again | Martin Kettle

  • Bias Rating

    -68% Medium Liberal

  • Reliability

    70% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    -68% Medium Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

9% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

72% : Indifference, skilfully translated into policy and action, was an essential driver of his 14-year presidency.
61% : Michael Gove told the inquiry last week that Johnson liked to listen to contending arguments about courses of action before coming to a decision.
59% : He combines indifference to principles and disregard for others with disorganisation of mind and behaviour, and indecisiveness and laziness in action.
57% : He famously wobbled about which side to take on Brexit.
56% : Seeing him in action once again, and with more to come on Thursday, it is the reckless incompetence and manifest unsuitability that stand out most.
43% : If that is his blessing, his curse is that, unlike Mitterrand, he could not then turn it into effective government action.
43% : Keith led Johnson through the crucial days in mid-March, when the argument inside government moved more decisively towards lockdown - a moment at which, according to Matt Hancock last week, 30,000 otherwise lost lives could have been saved by an earlier imposition.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link