Chicago Tribune Article Rating

Letters: Let's end the 'stolen valor' brouhaha over Tim Walz and JD Vance

Aug 13, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    84% Very Conservative

  • Reliability

    65% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    68% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -24% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

18% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : It is very apparent that Trump indicated that Harris was being opportunistic and using her racial heritage for political advantage.
52% : While it's true that Vance also honorably served in the military for several years, it's also true that at the top of his ticket stands Trump, a man who notoriously and shamelessly cited his "bone spurs" to get out of the draft and avoid military service.
37% : Unfortunately, there are very few McCain Republicans left, and the party of Trump is now the acceptable or unacceptable option.
37% : But Page deliberately tries to assign racism to Trump as the motivation for his comments.
23% : While I would never consider voting for a felon found guilty on 34 counts, someone found liable of sexual assault by a jury of his peers, a draft dodger or a man who stole confidential and top secret documents from "we the people," I do believe Trump sealed his fate by selecting the MAGA extremist JD Vance.
17% : What's more, Trump is infamously known to have called those who serve "suckers" and "losers.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link